
Zelaya, without legal authority, sought a national referendum on whether the Constitution should be amended to remove provisions that would bar hm from seeking another term as President. According to a recent Wall Street Journal article, Honduran law allows constitutional amendments, but a constituent assembly to effect them can only be called through a national referendum approved by the Honduran Congress, not the president. The article describes what happened next:
. . . Mr. Zelaya declared the vote on his own and had [Venezuelan President Hugo] Chávez ship him the necessary ballots from Venezuela. The Supreme Court ruled his referendum unconstitutional, and it instructed the military not to carry out the logistics of the vote as it normally would do.
The top military commander, Gen. Romeo Vásquez Velásquez, told the president that he would have to comply. Mr. Zelaya promptly fired him. The Supreme Court ordered him reinstated. Mr. Zelaya refused.
Calculating that some critical mass of Hondurans would take his side, the president decided he would run the referendum himself. So on Thursday he led a mob that broke into the military installation where the ballots from Venezuela were being stored and then had his supporters distribute them in defiance of the Supreme Court's order.
The attorney general had already made clear that the referendum was illegal, and he further announced that he would prosecute anyone involved in carrying it out. Yesterday, Mr. Zelaya was arrested by the military and is now in exile in Costa Rica.

As WSJ notes, "Honduras is fighting back by strictly following the constitution. The Honduran Congress met in emergency session yesterday and designated its president [Roberto Micheletti] as the interim executive as stipulated in Honduran law. It also said that presidential elections set for November will go forward. The Supreme Court later said that the military acted on its orders."


Reuters reports that on Wednesday, the Organization of American States issued a weekend deadline for the interim government to reinstate Zelaya. Micheletti replied: "We have established a democratic government and we will not cede to pressure from anyone. We are a sovereign country."
The basis for the specious outrage of the Obama administration and its leftist allies is the fact that Zelaya was democratically elected to the presidency several years ago. They seem to believe that, having once won a national plebiscite, everything Zelaya says and does thereafter is blessed by the democratic process--he can do no political wrong. They all know better than that. The model was established by Adolf Hitler, whose National Socialist (Nazi) Party came to power through "democratic" elections--aided, of course, by intrigue, mob violence, intimidation, and propaganda--and then used "legal" legislative and executive processes to force changes in the German constitution and laws that endowed Hitler with dictatorial powers. Proceeding in this way gives the aspiring tyrant and his actions the color of legitimacy, and thereby disarms his opponents. Hugo Chavez has used the same tactics of populist intimidation to gain near-absolute control over Venezuela, and has been eagerly exporting the brand all over Latin America, succeeding to varying degrees in Ecuador, Bolivia, Argentina and Nicaragua. He was actively supporting Manuel Zelaya's naked power grab in Honduras when that country's legal institutions acted to snatch the prize away before he could get a death grip on it. Clearly, democracy can be subverted just as effectively--more so, perhaps--from within as from without, and by power-hungry elected presidents as well as by street-level revolutionaries.
That the Obama administration would condemn the Honduran patriots and people and seek to undermine their democratic efforts, rather than support them, is a shocking revelation of what its true priorities and agenda are. Certainly the shoe would be on the other foot had Zelaya been a right-wing usurper. Obviously, faithfulness to socialism is more important than liberty, democracy, or the rule of law. Solidarity with the likes of Chavez, Ortega, Morales, and the Castro brothers is more important than the integrity of our own government and the values that the United States has traditionally represented, and sought to gain for others. Right now, American representatives are working--and twisting arms, no doubt--to re-foist a would-be dictator on the Honduran people. Is the administration tryiing to spread socialist orthodoxy throughout the Western Hemisphere, even where it's not wanted, and regardless of our national interests? Or is Mr. Obama fearful that at some point, brave souls in this country might emulate the Hondurans' example and try to prevent him from cementing his own socialist dictatorship over all of us?
At the very least, it seems obvious that had Mr. Obama been the U.S. President in the years leading up to World War II, and anti-Nazi elements in Germany had been able to remove him from office (as many wanted, and a few planned), he would have spared no effort to reverse such an action and restore Der Fuhrer to power. We know he'd prefer that the Iraqi people still be suffering under the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein. Isn't it strange how "Democrats" are so attached to tyrants?
UPDATE--July 3, 2009: Sen. Jim DeMint (R., S.C.) has issued a strong statement denouncing the Obama administration's treacherous, bullying treatment of the legitimate Honduran government and its efforts to ensure true democracy and freedom in that country. You'll want to read the statement in its entirety:
July 2, 2009 - Greenville, SC - Today, U.S. Senator Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina), member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and chairman of the Senate Steering Committee, made the following statement about the ongoing situation in Honduras.Hats off to Sen. DeMint!
"The people of Honduras have struggled too long to have their hard-won democracy stolen from them by a Chavez-style dictator. The Honduran Congress, the Honduran Supreme Court, and the Honduran military have acted in accordance to the Honduran constitution and the rule of law.
“For weeks leading to his arrest, Zelaya flouted the constitutional authority of the Honduran Congress and Supreme Court, and claimed for himself extra-constitutional control of his nation’s military and political institutions. Every institution from the Electoral Tribunal to the Supreme Court ruled that his actions were unjustified and illegal. Zelaya’s open defiance of democratic norms has set Honduras on a path toward violence, instability, and tyranny.
“I am hopeful that as President Obama grows in office, he will eventually turn away from despots like Ahmadinejad, Chavez, Castro, and Zelaya, and give the United States’ full-throated support to the people of any country who are fighting for the same values we cherish and defend in America. The people fighting for freedom around the world, in Iran and Honduras, should never have to wonder which side America will choose between freedom and tyranny.
“President Obama’s call for the reinstatement of Zelaya is a slap in the face to the people of Honduras. And the resolution written by the Organization of American States tramples over the hopes and dreams of a free and democratic people.
“The rule of law is working in Honduras. President Obama should not undermine the democratic institutions that guarantee freedom by forcing an illegitimate President back into power.
“This is not an ideal transition, but Hondurans are adhering to their constitution. The United States should support the Honduran people and their legitimate leaders in their brave and heroic stand for freedom and the rule of law.”
No comments:
Post a Comment